Citizenship RIGHTS are one of the intellectual foundations of democracy and the basic concepts of democratic life. Citizenship is a category that is tied to the concept of the culture of each society and the culture of each border and environment is derived from the three basic realms of social activities, the political environment and the economic status of that society. In a civil society, the RIGHTS of an individual include: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, meaning the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of the citizens of a society, political RIGHTS, meaning the right to participate in political processes, social RIGHTS, which include economic RIGHTS and minimum standards of living in social facilities. The degree of observance and attention to citizen's RIGHTS in any country can be measured by the scale of legislative assemblies and other legislative bodies. In this regard, citizenship RIGHTS, as one of the most obvious individual and group RIGHTS, has a significant contribution to the feeling of social justice, so that the degree of observance of citizenship RIGHTS in the society is considered a suitable criterion for measuring social, political, economic and cultural inequalities. In general, respect for the RIGHTS of citizens and their observance and guarantee in a society far from color, language, race, ethnicity and religion have always been emphasized, especially in the Islamic society of Iran, whose foundations are laid according to the standards of Islam. Today, citizenship RIGHTS and attention to political and civil RIGHTS, economic, social, and cultural RIGHTS and freedoms, judicial RIGHTS of members of the society are one of the inseparable elements of every constitution, and the need to pay attention and protect citizenship RIGHTS in the numerous principles of the fifth chapter (Laws nation) the constitution of the republic is clearly stated. Therefore, the main meaning of citizenship RIGHTS is to observe and preserve the RIGHTS of individuals and human beings in the larger part of society, and citizens should enjoy all RIGHTS, including political and civil RIGHTS, judicial RIGHTS, economic and welfare RIGHTS.

Committing crime against a person, in addition to multiple physical, financial, psychological and emotional injuries for the victim, on the one hand, it places him in the various maze of medical, judicial and police centers and in the other hand, he will be faced with the intervention of others and various cases including criminal, legal, administrative cases and others.Suffering injuries, he does not have any previous physical and mental ability.Thus, in addition to identifying the problems and the needs of crime victims, the foundation of their RIGHTS in the criminal justice process should be based on solid one. Undoubtedly, respect for the high value of human dignity as one of the FUNDAMENTAL, equal and inevitable transmission RIGHTS of human being, is based on a strong foundation. It consists of three basic RIGHTS: identification, cooperation, supporting and compensating the damage of the crime victim that the examples of these three RIGHTS will be considered in this paper.

Cyber terrorism occurs if the critical infrastructure of a state including air transportation, dams, nuclear power plants and power generation plants, banking and financial systems are attacked politically motivated or under the ideological actions aimed at forcing the government or organizations with a variety of malware weapons, and thereby causing fear and panic. There is no a comprehensive definition of terrorism on international community and even there is no compulsory comprehensive instrument on this issue, but this new form of terrorism along with other forms such as bioterrorism, nuclear terrorism and eco-terrorism may cause harmful damages compared to the classic types of terrorism. Cyber terrorism disturbs public order and therefore it is known as violating human RIGHTS law in each of its four generations in addition to breaches of the Peace and Security. The importance of addressing human RIGHTS violations by terrorists in the cyberspace, as well as in the context of the fight against cyber-terrorism, must be taken into account in a comprehensive response to this phenomenon. The current paper is a descriptive-analytical study. Data was collected using library sources.

Proper prison management and respect and guarantee of human RIGHTS are among the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of prisoners. This issue has caused the country's policymakers to use humanistic approaches in high-level documents to determine a Policy for legislation, including the general judicial policies approved in 1381 the general five-year judicial policies approved in 1388 the general policies of the sixth development plan approved in 1391. Supreme Leader and the document of judicial transformation in the second step of the revolution approved in 2019 Measures such as decriminalization of criminal titles, reduction of punishments, especially prison sentences, transfer of some judicial cases to quasi-judicial In the framework of these documents, measures such as decriminalization of criminal titles, reduction of punishments, especially prison sentences, appropriate use of quasi-judicial institutions, reform and management of prisons and prisoners have been adopted in order to reduce the number of the criminal population in the light of their application. Therefore, in order to implement these inclusive policies and policies, and considering the challenges facing the prison, in this research, visiting the Evin and women's prisons in Tehran, as well as participating in the planning meetings of the prisons organization, as well as cooperating in the design of the current situation review and The desirability of the central prison of Gilan (Lakan) was identified, it is necessary that the organization of prisons and security and educational measures of the country prepare and compile a training program for managers and employees of the country's prisons.

The discourses related to labour law like any other approach of human RIGHTS requires design a theory about RIGHTS that emphasizes on legal and moral necessity and justifying the existence and value of FUNDAMENTAL principles and rules of work, specially in some important and effective scope in life and basis of labour law such as elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation, equal remuneration, abolition of forced labour, right to collective bargaining negotiations and freedom of association. The fact that the criteria of labour law to what extent is a part of human RIGHTS, is a discrepant and challenging issue, but certainly, content and context of FUNDAMENTAL conventions of work clearly represents principle and criteria of human RIGHTS and because of this, all members even if they have not ratified the convention in question have an obligation to respect and perform it.

Traditionally, FUNDAMENTAL human RIGHTS have not played a role in private law, particularly in contract law. These RIGHTS have originally been established to prevent state violation of individual RIGHTS. However, the occurrence of unequal contractual relations among individuals and its consequences have led to debates concerning the necessity of recourse to FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS in order to protect freedom of contract. The nucleus canon is whether it is possible to grant a FUNDAMENTAL character to contractual freedoms to prevent any kind of abuse of formal freedom of contract principle. By conducting an analytical-descriptive research method, this article aims to discuss comparatively the role of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS in the field of freedom of contract. It can be concluded that recourse to FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS in dealing with freedom of contract has resulted in emergence of a substantial notion of contractual freedom and even in some cases have attributed FUNDAMENTAL position and status to the principle of freedom of contract.

The trend of the events of previous decades and current demands of the international society reveals that the manner of development, comprehensiveness and universality of the global declaration of human RIGHTS and the UN human right conventions are in the same direction as the interests of all nations and country members of the United Nations.The thinking of the international society over a series of human RIGHTS rules such as the prohibition of torture, slavery, right to live, freedom of speech, etc., which are called FUNDAMENTAL rules of human RIGHTS, Noyau dur, are also inviolable. These two assumptions have impacts on institutionalization of human right norms and supporting human RIGHTS anywhere in the world including Iran. So what strategy would be applied by Iran against the process of universality of human RIGHTS? This is important since many scholars of International Relations and International Law believe that the universality of human RIGHTS is a bridge to security and development of countries. Putting this claim aside, we pose this key question that what is the optimal strategy of Iran against the process of universality of human RIGHTS? Our main hypothesis is that: since native/local culture as well as long-standing cultural, religious and national beliefs of every country about the subject of human RIGHTS, are relatively comprehensive and universal, the optimal strategy for Iran is to insist on cross cultural characteristics of the FUNDAMENTAL rules of human RIGHTS. To survey this issue and test this hypothesis, we will focus on the state of formation of human right conventions and Iran’s positions, cultural distinctions of Iran and various universalities, RIGHTS of reservation and special interpretations of human RIGHTS, theoretical and academic discussions over the universality of human RIGHTS, and finally cultural relativity and the impact of cross cultural strategy of FUNDAMENTAL rules of human RIGHTS on the conciliation between relativity and universality of human RIGHTS.

As a new technology, HAARP has several adverse effects on the international community, even though its owners say it is intended to study ionospheres to develop new technologies, facilitate radio communication, and counteract the negative effects of atomic explosions. This was not the case in principle, and its abuses and deviations have been observed, turning it into a technology against humanity. This article aims to examine the abuses of HAARP 's technology and how they violate FUNDAMENTAL human RIGHTS. Research methods are descriptive and analytical, and data collection is done through collection and filing. In this qualitative study, researchers found that Haarp's new technology violates FUNDAMENTAL human RIGHTS, including the right to life, freedom of thought, and future generations' RIGHTS.

Research on the impact of artificial intelligence on FUNDAMENTAL freedoms and human RIGHTS is of great importance and can help preserve FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS and human RIGHTS in the digital world. Artificial intelligence algorithms are typically designed in a complex and non-interpretable manner, which may lead to violation of human RIGHTS or the use of such algorithms in the collection and processing of personal data, thereby violating privacy or legal RIGHTS of individuals. With the transparent and interpretable design of artificial intelligence algorithms which should be developed by organizations and governments and by using privacy protocols and laws in collecting and processing personal data and designing appropriate mechanisms to modify and protest decisions, it is possible to mitigate the challenges arising from the use of artificial intelligence. The main goal of this research is to gain a deeper understanding of the impacts of this innovative technology on the principles and FUNDAMENTAL concepts of human RIGHTS and FUNDAMENTAL freedoms. This article uses library tools and descriptive-analytical methods to better understand the challenges and opportunities that artificial intelligence creates for human RIGHTS and FUNDAMENTAL freedoms or threatens them. The present research focuses on providing solutions for determining appropriate legal standards to preserve FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS and manage them in the digital world.